Disney-Pixar’s
latest offering, The Good Dinosaur,
is exactly that – it’s good. It’s certainly not bad, but it’s also not great.
On the scale of Pixar films that has Toy
Story 3, Ratatouie, and The
Incredibles at the top and Cars 2
and Monsters University at the
bottom, The Good Dinosaur is squarely
in the middle. There are elements of it that are sublime but other aspects that
are pretty ho-hum.
The concept of the film itself is unusual. We’re used to talking animal cartoons. Those have been around since the very beginning of movies. But there are usually two kinds - those animals interacting with humans in the world we know. Think of the talking mice helping Cinderella sew her dress or Bugs Bunny foiling Elmer Fudd once again. Then there’s the animals-as-humans approach like the iguana and snake gunslingers in the old west cartoon Rango or Hamlet played with African beasts in The Lion King.
What makes The Good Dinosaur a little unusual is
that while it features animals and humans interacting, their roles are
reversed. The giant lizards are the evolved, civilized ones and the humans are
the inarticulate ones just barely learning to walk. Instead of the expected
dynamic of dinosaurs fearing people or being subservient to them, the movie’s
main human character is a dog-like pet to the character from the title.
Basically, The Good Dinosaur is a western. It’s
about a family of homesteaders trying to carve out a life for themselves in the
shadow of some mountains that looks suspiciously like the Grand Tetons in
Wyoming. They’ve built themselves a cabin (a big one) and spend their days
tilling the land and raising corn so they can have enough food to survive the
winter. The film opens with the birth (or hatching to be more specific) of the
homesteaders’ three children – the free spirited Libby, the brutish and
thickheaded Buck, and the shrimpy, scared Arlo.
Arlo grows
up to be skittish and, frankly, a little unlikeable. His timidity is funny at
times but grating at others. His funny, panicky scream featured so prominently
in the movie’s trailer is featured even more prominently in the movie. After
the forty seventh identical scream in the first third of the film, it begins to
lose its charm.
Anyway, the
real story begins when Arlo is separated from his family. He gets washed far
downstream in a river and then has to make his way back over miles and miles of
the most gorgeously rendered western landscape I’ve ever seen in a film. He is
accompanied by the human boy he names Spot, and Spot, who is brave and resourceful,
ends up saving Arlo’s life repeatedly.
While moving
at times, the story fails to tap into the same vein of universality that the
best Pixar films hit. Again, it’s good but not great. What is great, however,
is the depiction of the dinosaurs’ physical environment. If there weren’t
purple and green dinosaurs galumphing everywhere, you would think they simply
took hi-def cameras and the world’s best cinematographer to Wyoming and Montana
and just filmed everything. There is a level of uncannily beautiful photorealism
in The Good Dinosaur that is better
than anything you’ve seen in a computer-generated film so far. It is one great
aspect of an otherwise good film.
I don't think I would agree with your Pixar quality scale. I would put Rattatouille somewhat lower and Monsters University somewhat higher.
ReplyDelete