Friday, November 10, 2017

Thor: Ragnarok




It’s interesting to watch something as lucrative and culturally far-reaching as the Marvel movie shared universe evolve. In the near decade since the first Iron Man movie proved that comic book-based films could be successful (wildly successful, in fact), the entertainment juggernaut has tweaked and evolved as each film has come out. Standalone movies like Iron Man did well but team-up films like The Avengers did better. So standalone movies became backdoor team-up movies. Serious-minded films like Captain America: Winter Soldier did well, but funny ones like Guardians of the Galaxy did better. So franchises that started out very serious and even dark, like Thor, have evolved and started to include punchlines, pratfalls, and absurdism. So what we have now is Thor: Ragnarok, the latest model in Marvel’s effort to create the perfect money-making machine. And so far, it’s going pretty well. Ragnarok is Marvel’s 17th film in a row to open at number one, clearing a tidy 121 million dollars last weekend.


 Rather than the glossy Shakespeare lite of the first film or the darker, much more boring mythology of the second one, the third Thor film goes full Guardians of the Galaxy, embracing color, childish bickering, and a winking “Isn’t this funny” tone throughout. And generally, the film is better for it. Thor as a character isn’t that interesting and never really has been. And the long, flowing hair, Viking accoutrements, and family of gods and demigods have always been a bit of a hard sell. But now, thanks to the direction of Taika Waititi and his team of screenwriters led by Eric Pearson, Thor becomes a winking, smirking blowhard whose heart is in the right place but whose brain is sometimes a little on the slower side. The opening sequence with Thor dangling from a chain before Sutur, a fiery Satanic figure destined to destroy Thor’s homeland, is actually really funny. Any time Surtur really starts monologuing, he’s interrupted by Thor inadvertently turning his back on him as the chain he’s dangling from keeps twisting him around. It’s absurd and knowing and pretty funny. Not something that would have happened in the first two iterations of this character but it’s an approach that I suspect will be used pretty frequently going forward.

As I mentioned, Ragnarok is also a team-up movie. So it’s really Thor and Hulk’s outer space adventures. As the trailers made obvious, Thor and Hulk face off in an arena and pound the crud out of each other. The trials of Bruce Banner and his monstrous, green alter ego are almost as important in the film as Thor’s own. So Marvel finally found a way to make a successful Hulk movie – and that was to not make a Hulk movie at all and to just let him ride the cape tails of someone else. In this case, it works. Hulk provides some of the films funniest lines and situations, again, many of which were given away in numerous trailers.

Kate Blanchett makes for a more entertaining and memorable villain than Marvel movies usually get, and the production design is a really lovely tribute to the great Jack Kirby, the artist who designed so much of what we see in this shared universe these days. Kirby was the creator or co-creator of Thor, Captain America, the Fantastic Four, Agent Carter, the Inhumans, and a raft of others. His sense of design was so distinct and influential, it’s a real treat to see it get the big budget treatment it receives here.

Even though it features the end of the world (kind of) and gods and monsters clashing, Thor: Ragnarok feels pretty lightweight. That’s not necessarily a criticism. There’s enough heaviness in the world right now, and sometimes a funny movie featuring a god of thunder plowing into an army of zombie soldiers to the tune of Led Zepplin’s “Immigrant Song” is exactly the thing you need.

Don’t doubt that Marvel Studios knows it too.   

No comments:

Post a Comment