Last week, the Utah-based independent filmmaker Richard
Dutcher filed a lawsuit against the makers of the movie Nightcrawler saying, in essence that it was a rip-off of Dutcher’s
own movie, Falling which came out in
2008. When I read this news online, I was immediately intrigued. Of course,
lawsuits and accusations of plagiarism are as common in Hollywood as an actor
waiting tables. But this particular case is unique for me. I wrote my dissertation
about Richard Dutcher and his films, including an entire chapter devoted to Falling. I’ve watched it dozens of times
and feel like I know it as well as I know any film I’ve ever seen. If Falling is being plagiarized, I figured
I had to investigate.
Falling is the
story of Eric Boyle, a lapsed Mormon living in Los Angeles trying to make it as
a filmmaker with his aspiring actress wife, Davey. To pay the bills, Boyle
works as a stringer – a cameraman who trolls the streets of La La Land filming
car crashes, house fires, suicides, and homicides. He then sells the footage to
local news broadcasts. The bloodier and more dramatic the footage, the more he
gets paid. Spending all night filming tragedy and all day getting told his
screenplays aren’t violent enough takes its toll on Eric and we see him fraying
at the edges even as the film begins. Things really go south for him when he
stumbles upon and films gang members killing a man. Boyle makes big bucks selling
the footage, but then the killers, unhappy with the publicity, slowly and methodically
track him down, brutally attacking everyone in their way. The film ends with an
excruciatingly visceral face-off between Boyle and the men he filmed.
Nightcrawler came
out last fall and was written and directed by Dan Gilroy. It stars Jake Gyllenhall
as Louis Bloom, a sociopathic small-time thief who becomes a stringer. He
spends his nights listening to police scanners and filming accidents, fires,
and homicides, but unlike Boyle, Bloom crosses the line and begins altering
crime scenes in order to get better footage. He does literally whatever it
takes to get the best, bloodiest, most dramatic shots possible, even when it
means invading crime scenes, breaking and entering, or in some cases actually
causing things to happen so he can be on hand to film them. Things begin to go
south for Louis when he stumbles across a murder in progress and films it. The
climax of the movie is an intense confrontation with the murderers.
Despite the obvious similarities, Falling and Nightcrawler
are not the same. Falling is a
spiritual film in the tradition of Robert Bresson. It’s bleak and unforgiving.
It attacks its viewers with Old Testament vengeance. It is a film of spiritual,
emotional, and physical consequences for both its characters and its viewers.
It is about the loss of one man’s soul.
Nightcrawler is a
glossed-up commentary on the American dream. It suggests that as long as you
are a successful self-made man, it doesn’t matter what sort of man you’ve made
yourself into. Louis Bloom stands in for every successful politician, media
figure, or power player who was willing to step on the necks of those around
them to achieve a goal. Unlike Eric Boyle, Louis Bloom has no soul to lose. And
despite the high body count in the film, there’s no sense of real consequences
anywhere.
So the films are not the same, but that’s not what the
lawsuit alleges. It claims that Nightcrawler
is a derivative work which means it takes obvious, identifiable elements of an
already existing work and uses them without permission. While Nightcrawler is good movie –
suspenseful, well-shot, well-acted – I doubt it would exist if Falling hadn’t existed first. The whole
thing feels as though Dan Gilroy watched Falling
and said, “You know what would be really cool in this movie? If the main guy
was a sociopath!” Nightcrawler is
essentially really well-made Falling
fan fiction.
Of course, I have no idea what will come of the lawsuit.
Cases like this can go on for ages, and the makers of Nightcrawler are powerful and well-funded. But I have high hopes because, having seen
both films, it seems obvious that Falling
came first.
What a strange blog. The author takes the time to list factual observations about both movies, then draws a conclusion that is pure speculation and contrary to the facts that he has presented.
ReplyDelete“Nightcrawler is essentially really well made Falling fan fiction.”
This conclusion is devoid of proof. It is also devoid of an understanding of what fan fiction is.
Fan fiction is fiction (presumably written by a fan) that features characters from an existing work (movie, TV series, etc).
“Nightcrawler” contains absolutely no characters from “Falling” so it does not qualify as fan fiction.
In both movies, the protagonist is a freelance videographer. If this qualifies as meeting the definition of “fan fiction” (which it does not), then - by that definition - “The Boys At The Bar” is “Cheers” fan fiction and “Evil Angel” is “The Exorcist” fan fiction.
The author’s final sentence is also puzzling:
“Having seen both films, it seems obvious that Falling came first.”
One doesn’t need to see both films to know that “Falling” came first. It did. In fact, it doesn’t merely “seem” obvious that it did, because it did. “Falling” came first. That is, perhaps, the ONLY fact about this allegation that is immediately provable.
Having read this blog (and having seen both films), it seems obvious that it was written by a fan.