Tuesday, April 23, 2019

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote - Review



Terry Gilliam’s long-awaited film, The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, has been anticipated for so long, it was hard to imagine that it could live up to the mythology and hype of its storied delays. Lawsuits, death, and natural disasters galore plagued the film’s 25+ year production history, so much so that documentaries were made about Don Quixote NOT being made. When it finally came to theaters for a one-night only engagement, I entered with a lot of trepidation, worried that all the build-up would likely lead to nothing really worth talking about. 

 
Fortunately, I was wrong. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is Terry Gilliam in top, weird form.
This iteration of the film stars Adam Driver as Toby, a pretentious, selfish advertising exec filming a commercial in Spain. It’s clear from the get-go that Toby is a cad and kind of a jerk as he casually uses women in his crew and treats his staff like barely existent idiots. Then he comes across a DVD copy of his own student film that he shot in that same area of Spain ten years before back when he was an idealistic film student. In a fit of nostalgia, he returns Los Suenos, the village where he filmed to find that Javier, the man who played Don Quixote in his film still thinks he is Miguel Cervantes’ famous protagonist. (Incidentally, Los Suenos is Spanish for the dreams.) Through a series of mishaps, Toby sets the village on fire and ends up in trouble with the law. Our would-be Quixote rescues him and the two go on the run in a kaleidoscopic quest through gorgeous Spanish backdrops. There’s time travel and/or an elaborate dream sequence, jousting, a damsel who may or may not need rescuing, and plenty of bickering between Quixote and Toby who he thinks is actually his sidekick, Sancho Panza. 

When Gilliam is at his best, as he is here, his work is loose, unpredictable, and weird in a fun way. He definitely has his stylistic quirks – he never seen a rearing horse he didn’t want to film in slo-mo and he’s never met a tilted camera angle he didn’t like. But despite these idiosyncracies, the film remains spry and enjoyable instead of quirky for quirk’s sake. The cinematography is rich and lovely, and the special effects, while state of the art, maintain the same cartoonish nature Gilliam developed as an animator for Monty Python.

Driver is truly the star of this film and is a surprisingly gifted comic actor. His line delivery made me laugh out loud repeatedly throughout the film. Richard Pryce as Javier/Don Quixote is pretty great. His lunacy serves as an excellent foil to Driver’s exasperated Toby.

The film is packed with Gilliam’s inside jokes, references and meta-filmic gags. Early on, characters speak in subtitled Spanish but soon Toby simply says, “We know each other. We don’t need these” and sweeps the subtitles off the screen with his hand like dust off a windowsill. During the flash flood that halted filming back in 2000, famously there was footage of two mattresses being swept away. In the 2019 film, when he’s on the run from the law, Toby dives inbetween two dirty mattresses on a garbage heap that looks like what was left after a flash flood. For people who followed The Man Who Killed Don Quixote for the last quarter century, there are plenty of Easter eggs to reward their attentive viewing.

In the end, the title of the film proves to be truth in advertising as Pryce’s character does indeed die. However, the film demonstrates that characters like Don Quixote and the obsession they inspire never really die. Instead, they get passed on almost like a virus from one reader or believer to the next.

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is unpredictable to say the least, but the most suprising thing about it is how it managed to be a pleasant surprise after all this time.

Friday, April 5, 2019

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote




Last year, I did a show about director Terry Gilliam’s twenty year effort to make his film, The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. The movie is something of a production-hell legend. Gilliam originally began filming it back in 1989 with a fresh-faced young actor known for his edgy independent film roles, an actor named Johnny Depp. Thanks to a series of bad luck and bad choices – including trying to film next to a Spanish air force base during F-16 training, a storm that swept away sets, an actor with a double herniated disc in his back, the abrupt pulling of funding that was pretty shaky in the first place, and the loss of ownership of his own script – Gilliam filmed for three days and then spent the next twenty years trying to finish what he’d only just barely started. 

 
Last April, Gilliam announced that he had finished principal photography and he released a trailer online. Depp had been replaced by Adam Driver and the now deceased French actor who was originally cast as Don Quixote had been replaced by Richard Pryce. The trailer looked like classic Gilliam – fanciful, fantastic, and slightly unhinged. At the time of the trailer’s release, I wrote, “For film nerds who follow the esoterica of troubled film productions, this is a big deal, and many of my movie buff friends are saying things like, ‘I can’t believe it’s finally happening!’ My response remains the same. I will believe that Gilliam has finished and successfully released this remarkably fraught production when I am sitting in the theater and it plays all the way from the beginning to the end of the closing credits and not until then. Because with Gilliam’s luck on this project, it’s entirely possible every copy of the film will spontaneously burst into flame before anyone actually ends up seeing it.” This proved to be true because the week after the trailer dropped, Gilliam was again sued by an investor for ownership of the film. When I heard the news, I rolled my eyes and assumed it would be another twenty years before the movie ever saw the light of day.

However, my well-earned cynicism is no longer warranted. This coming week, on Wednesday, April 10th, Fathom, a company that does movie related events like the 30 year anniversary re-releases and broadcasts of operas from the Met, will have a one-night only showing of Gilliam’s now completed  The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. There will be one showing only at 7 p.m. and it’s scheduled to play at theaters in Saginaw, Bay City, and Flint.

The irony of the subject matter and the story of the production is not lost on me. Quixote is a man consumed by his vision of the world, who pursues an impossible quest, and who takes on giant, impervious structures that he can never really defeat. Gilliam too is a man whose idiosyncratic vision consumes his whole world. He’s been tilting at the windmills of Hollywood for most of his career, earning a reputation, deservedly or not, as “out of control.” The fact that The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is one of his most infamous pictures and that it is mostly famous for not being made is appropriate. 

I have no idea if the film will be any good. Gilliam has made some good, borderline great movies in his day and he’s made some that are basically unwatchable, so there’s no telling. But one thing is for sure. On Wednesday, April 10th at 7 p.m. I am going to be in a theater, popcorn and diet Pepsi in hand, ready to find out for myself. I suspect that The Man Who Killed Don Quixote will get released to streaming and disc pretty quickly, but I’ve been waiting too long to not see it the first chance I get. With a history like this movie has, it’s probably best to see it while I can.